Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Hypertension ; 81(5): 1095-1105, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The SPYRAL HTN-ON MED (Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications)trial showed significant office and nighttime systolic blood pressure (BP) reductions in patients with hypertension following renal denervation (RDN) compared with sham-control patients, despite similar 24-hour BP reductions. We compared antihypertensive medication and BP changes among prespecified subpopulations. METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, blinded SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (n=337) evaluated BP changes after RDN compared with a sham procedure in patients with hypertension prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive drugs. Most patients (n=187; 54%) were enrolled outside the United States, while 156 (46%) US patients were enrolled, including 60 (18%) Black Americans. RESULTS: Changes in detected antihypertensive drugs were similar between RDN and sham group patients in the outside US cohort, while drug increases were significantly more common in the US sham group compared with the RDN group. Patients from outside the United States showed significant reductions in office and 24-hour mean systolic BP at 6 months compared with the sham group, whereas BP changes were similar between RDN and sham in the US cohort. Within the US patient cohort, Black Americans in the sham control group had significant increases in medication burden from baseline through 6 months (P=0.003) but not in the RDN group (P=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled outside the United States had minimal antihypertensive medication changes between treatment groups and had significant office and 24-hour BP reductions compared with the sham group. Increased antihypertensive drug burden in the US sham cohort, especially among Black Americans, may have diluted the treatment effect in the combined trial population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02439775.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Hypertension , Humans , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney , Blood Pressure/physiology , Denervation/methods , Sympathectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(2): 358-365, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular therapy of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes in women vs men. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown similarly favorable outcomes in men and women in calcified coronary arteries, there is no published safety and effectiveness data of peripheral IVL differentiated by sex. This study aims to evaluate sex-specific acute procedural safety and effectiveness following IVL treatment of calcified PAD. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the multicenter Disrupt PAD III Observational Study, which assessed short-term procedural outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of symptomatic calcified lower extremity PAD with the Shockwave peripheral IVL system. Adjudicated acute safety and efficacy outcomes were compared by sex using univariate analysis performed with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1262 patients (29.9% women) were included, with >85% having moderate to severe lesion calcification. Women were older (74 vs 71 years; P < .001), had lower ankle-brachial index (0.7 vs 0.8; P = .003), smaller reference vessel size (5.3 vs 5.6 mm; P = .009), and more severe stenosis at baseline vs men (82.3% vs 79.8%; P = .012). Rates of diabetes, renal insufficiency, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, lesion length, and atherectomy use were similar in both groups. Residual stenosis after IVL alone was significantly reduced in both groups. Final residual stenosis was 21.9% in women and 24.7% in men (P = .001). Serious angiographic complications were infrequent and similar in both groups (1.4% vs 0.6%; P = .21), with no abrupt vessel closure, distal embolization, or thrombotic events during any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVL to treat calcified PAD in this observational registry demonstrated favorable acute safety and effectiveness in both women and men.


Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Vascular Calcification , Male , Humans , Female , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/etiology , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Lithotripsy/methods
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(3): 183-195, 2023 07 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to improve late event-free survival compared with metallic drug-eluting stents. However, initial trials demonstrated worse early outcomes with BVS, in part due to suboptimal technique. In the large-scale, blinded ABSORB IV trial, polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS implanted with improved technique demonstrated noninferior 1-year outcomes compared with cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes from the ABSORB IV trial. METHODS: We randomized 2,604 patients at 147 sites with stable or acute coronary syndromes to BVS with improved technique vs CoCr-EES. Patients, clinical assessors, and event adjudicators were blinded to randomization. Five-year follow-up was completed. RESULTS: Target lesion failure at 5 years occurred in 216 (17.5%) patients assigned to BVS and 180 (14.5%) patients assigned to CoCr-EES (P = 0.03). Device thrombosis within 5 years occurred in 21 (1.7%) BVS and 13 (1.1%) CoCr-EES patients (P = 0.15). Event rates were slightly greater with BVS than CoCr-EES through 3-year follow-up and were similar between 3 and 5 years. Angina, also centrally adjudicated, recurred within 5 years in 659 patients (cumulative rate 53.0%) assigned to BVS and 674 (53.3%) patients assigned to CoCr-EES (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale, blinded randomized trial, despite the improved implantation technique, the absolute 5-year rate of target lesion failure was 3% greater after BVS compared with CoCr-EES. The risk period for increased events was limited to 3 years, the time point of complete scaffold bioresorption; event rates were similar thereafter. Angina recurrence after intervention was frequent during 5-year follow-up but was comparable with both devices.(Absorb IV Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT02173379).


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Absorbable Implants , Everolimus , Prosthesis Design , Stents , Tissue Scaffolds , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Endovasc Ther ; 29(1): 76-83, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34380334

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave S4 intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) catheter in an "all-comers" cohort of patients with calcified infrapopliteal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Disrupt PAD III Observational Study (NCT02923193) is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter single-arm study designed to assess the "real-world" acute safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Peripheral IVL System for the treatment of de novo calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they had claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) and at least moderate calcification as assessed by angiography. This subanalysis includes consecutive patients enrolled with angiographic core lab-assessed treatment of infrapopliteal arteries using the Shockwave S4 IVL catheter. RESULTS: From July 2018 to August 2020, 101 patients with 114 calcified infrapopliteal arteries treated with the S4 IVL catheter were enrolled at 15 sites in 3 countries. CLI was present in 69.3% of patients. The anterior tibial and tiboperoneal trunk were the most commonly treated vessels with an overall mean reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 3.1±0.8 mm, minimum lumen diameter (MLD) of 0.5±0.6 mm, and a corresponding diameter stenosis of 83.4%±15.8% by core lab assessment. Mean lesion length was 64.7±54.7 mm with moderate to severe calcification in 69.3% of lesions by the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) criteria. Adjunctive calcium-modifying technology, defined as scoring or cutting balloon and/or atherectomy, was used in 22.7% of procedures. The average acute gain at the end of the procedure was 2.0±0.7 mm with a residual stenosis <50% achieved in 99.0% of lesions and a mean residual stenosis of 23.3±12.5%. There were no flow-limiting dissection, embolization, slow flow/no-reflow, or abrupt closure events at the end of the procedure. CONCLUSION: This subanalysis of the PAD III Observational Study represents the largest report to-date of IVL treatment of heavily calcified below-the-knee (BTK) lesions in a "real-world" patient cohort. The use of S4 IVL demonstrated consistent acute safety and effectiveness outcomes consistent with prior IVL peripheral studies. These consistent outcomes were achieved with the initial use of the S4 IVL catheter for treatment of complex BTK lesions.


Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , Vascular Calcification , Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia , Humans , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/therapy
5.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 14(12): 1352-1361, 2021 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to compare short-term outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal artery calcification receiving vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) prior to drug-coated balloon (DCB) for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of calcified peripheral artery lesions is associated with suboptimal vessel expansion and increased complication risk. Although initial results from single-arm studies with IVL have been reported, comparative evidence from randomized trials is lacking for most devices in the presence of heavy calcification. METHODS: The Disrupt PAD III (Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD) randomized trial enrolled patients with moderate or severe calcification in a femoropopliteal artery who underwent vessel preparation with IVL or PTA prior to DCB or stenting. The primary endpoint was core lab-adjudicated procedural success (residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection) prior to DCB or stenting. RESULTS: In patients receiving IVL (n = 153) or PTA (n = 153), procedural success was greater in the IVL group (65.8% vs. 50.4%; p = 0.01) and the percentage of lesions with residual stenosis ≤30% (66.4% vs. 51.9%; p = 0.02) was greater in the IVL group, while flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the PTA group (1.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03). Post-dilatation (5.2% vs. 17.0%; p = 0.001) and stent placement (4.6% vs. 18.3%; p < 0.001) were also greater in the PTA group. The rates of major adverse events (IVL: 0% vs. PTA: 1.3%; p = 0.16) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (IVL: 0.7% vs. PTA: 0.7%; p = 1.0) at 30 days were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: IVL is an effective vessel preparation strategy that facilitates definitive endovascular treatment in calcified femoropopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral artery disease. (Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD [Disrupt PAD III]; NCT02923193).


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Lithotripsy , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Vascular Calcification , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/therapy , Vascular Patency
6.
Circulation ; 143(22): 2143-2154, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33820424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accelerated endothelial healing after targeted antiproliferative drug delivery may limit the long-term inflammatory response of drug-eluting stents (DESs). The novel Supreme DES is designed to synchronize early drug delivery within 4 to 6 weeks of implantation, leaving behind a prohealing permanent base layer. Whether the Supreme DES is safe and effective in the short term and can improve long-term clinical outcomes is not known. METHODS: In an international, 2:1 randomized, single-blind trial, we compared treatment with Supreme DES to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. The primary end point was target lesion failure-a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 3.58%) of the Supreme DES at 12 months compared with DP-EES (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776). RESULTS: From October 2017 to July 2019, a total of 1629 patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the Supreme DES (N=1086) or DP-EES (N=543). At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 57 of 1057 patients (5.4%) in the Supreme DES group and in 27 of 532 patients (5.1%) in the DP-EES group (absolute risk difference, 0.32% [95% CI, -1.87 to 2.5]; Pnoninferiority=0.002]. There were no significant differences in rates of device success, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months, and the safety composite of cardiovascular death and target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.5% versus 4.6% (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.46-1.25]) with Supreme DES compared with DP-EES, although rates of combined clinically and non-clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months were higher with Supreme DES. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the Supreme DES proved to be noninferior to the standard DP-EES. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug-Eluting Stents/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(7): 1228-1235, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393942

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contrast media (CM) volume (CMV) saved using the DyeVert™ Plus Contrast Reduction System (DyeVert Plus System, Osprey Medical) in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiogram (CAG) and/or percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) procedures performed with manual injections. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate for monitoring and minimization of the total volume of CM in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. The DyeVert Plus System is an FDA cleared device designed to reduce CMV delivered during angiography and permit real-time CMV monitoring. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, single-arm, observational study. Eligible subjects were ≥ 18 years old with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . The primary endpoint was % CMV saved over the total procedure. A secondary objective was to evaluate adverse events (AEs) related to DyeVert Plus System or to CM use. RESULTS: A total of 114 subjects were enrolled at eight centers. Mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 72% were male, and mean body mass index was 29 ± 5. Baseline eGFR was 43 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CAG-only was performed in 65% of cases. One hundred and five subjects were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Mean CMV attempted was 112 ± 85 mL (range 22-681) and mean CMV delivered was 67 ± 51 mL (range 12-403), resulting in an overall CMV savings of 40.1 ± 8.8% (95% CI 38.4, 41.8; P < 0.0001) per procedure. Image quality was maintained in all but one case where the system was turned off for one injection. No DyeVert Plus System-related AEs were reported. Acute kidney injury (AKI; defined as serum creatinine rise of >0.3 mg/dL from baseline) was reported in 11 cases with seven occurring in subjects with baseline eGFR < 30 and three AKI events were attributed to CM. AKI rates increased as CMV/eGFR ratios increased. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest DyeVert Plus System use in CKD patients undergoing CAG and/or PCI results in clinically meaningful CMV savings while maintaining image quality.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Coronary Angiography/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Kidney/drug effects , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnostic imaging , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Protective Factors , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
8.
Lancet ; 392(10157): 1530-1540, 2018 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30266412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed more adverse events with coronary bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) than with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), although in one randomised trial angina was reduced with BVS. However, these early studies were unmasked, lesions smaller than intended for the scaffold were frequently enrolled, implantation technique was suboptimal, and patients with myocardial infarction, in whom BVS might be well suited, were excluded. METHODS: In the active-controlled, blinded, multicentre, randomised ABSORB IV trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes aged 18 years or older were recruited from 147 hospitals in five countries (the USA, Germany, Australia, Singapore, and Canada). Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with optimised implantation technique or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES; Xience; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by diabetic status, whether patients would have been eligible for enrolment in the previous ABSORB III trial, and site. Patients and clinical assessors were masked to randomisation. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation) at 30 days, tested for non-inferiority with a 2·9% margin for the risk difference. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02173379, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2014, and March 31, 2017, we screened 18 722 patients for eligibility, 2604 of whom were enrolled. 1296 patients were assigned to BVS, and 1308 patients were assigned to EES. Follow-up data at 30 days and 1 year, respectively, were available for 1288 and 1254 patients with BVS and for 1303 and 1272 patients with EES. Biomarker-positive acute coronary syndromes were present in 622 (24%) of 2602 patients, and, by angiographic core laboratory analysis, 78 (3%) of 2893 of lesions were in very small vessels. Target lesion failure at 30 days occurred in 64 (5·0%) patients assigned to BVS and 48 (3·7%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1·3%, upper 97·5% confidence limit 2·89; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0244). Target lesion failure at 1 year occurred in 98 (7·8%) patients assigned to BVS and 82 (6·4%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1·4%, upper 97·5% confidence limit 3·4; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0006). Angina, adjudicated by a central events committee at 1 year, occurred in 270 (20·3%) patients assigned to BVS and 274 (20·5%) patients assigned to EES (difference -0·3%, 95% CI -3·4% to 2·9%; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0008; two-sided psuperiority=0·8603). Device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in nine (0·7%) patients assigned to BVS and four (0·3%) patients assigned to EES (p=0·1586). INTERPRETATION: Polymeric BVS implanted with optimised technique in an expanded patient population resulted in non-inferior 30-day and 1-year rates of target lesion failure and angina compared with metallic DES. FUNDING: Abbott Vascular.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Tissue Scaffolds , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Aged , Biocompatible Materials , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Drug-Eluting Stents , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
9.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(16): 1601-1610, 2018 08 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30139467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the AVERT (AVERT Clinical Trial for Contrast Media Volume Reduction and Incidence of CIN) trial was to test the efficacy of the AVERT system to reduce the contrast media volume (CMV) used during coronary angiographic procedures without impairing image quality and to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients at risk for CI-AKI. BACKGROUND: CI-AKI is a common complication of percutaneous coronary procedures, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The AVERT system alters the coronary injection pressure profile by diverting contrast away from the patient during coronary injection. METHODS: The AVERT trial was a prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized clinical trial in 578 subjects with either baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate 20 to 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or estimated glomerular filtration rate 30 to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and at least 2 additional risk factors for CI-AKI. Patients undergoing coronary angiography with planned or possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to hydration plus the AVERT system (n = 292) or hydration only (n = 286). The primary effectiveness endpoints were: 1) the total CMV used; and 2) the incidence of CI-AKI, defined as a ≥0.3 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine within 5 days post-procedure. RESULTS: Patient demographics were well balanced between the groups, with mean baseline serum creatinine of 1.6 ± 0.4 mg/dl and 64.9% patients with diabetes mellitus. PCI was performed in 42.2% of procedures, with coronary angiography in the remainder. Use of AVERT resulted in a 15.5% relative reduction in CMV overall (85.6 ± 50.5 ml vs. 101.3 ± 71.1 ml; p = 0.02) and a 22.8% relative reduction in CMV among PCI patients (114 ± 55 ml vs. 147 ± 81 ml; p = 0.001). The maximum relative reduction in CMV was 46% (124 ± 48 ml vs. 232 ± 97 ml; p = 0.01) when ≥3 lesions were treated. There were no differences in the rates of CI-AKI (27.0% vs. 26.6%; p = 0.70) between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the AVERT system was feasible and safe, with acceptable image quality during coronary angiography and PCI. AVERT significantly reduced CMV, with the extent of CMV reduction correlating with procedural complexity. No significant differences in CI-AKI were observed with AVERT in this trial. (AVERT Clinical Trial for Contrast Media Volume Reduction and Incidence of CIN [AVERT]; NCT01976299).


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Coronary Angiography/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug Delivery Systems , Kidney/drug effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Creatinine/blood , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Humans , Injections , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Heart J ; 39(26): 2460-2468, 2018 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931092

ABSTRACT

Aims: Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicentre Study of OrbusNEich's Combo StEnt (HARMONEE) (NCT02073565) was a randomized pivotal registration trial of the Combo stent, which combined sirolimus and an abluminal bioabsorbable polymer with a novel endoluminal anti-CD34+ antibody coating designed to capture endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and promote percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) site healing. Methods and results: Clinically stabilized PCI subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive Combo or everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Between February 2014 and June 2016, 572 subjects with 675 coronary lesions underwent 1-year angiography and fractional flow reserve, with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the first 140 patients. The primary clinical endpoint was non-inferior 1-year target vessel failure (TVF). The primary mechanistic endpoint of EPC capture activity was superior strut coverage by OCT. Target vessel failure occurred in 7.0% Combo (20/287) vs. 4.2% EES (12/285), a 2.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.0%, 6.5%] difference, meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis (P = 0.02). There were no cardiac deaths, with one stent thrombosis observed in the EES group. Quantitative coronary angiography late loss with Combo was equivalent to EES. Optical coherence tomography strut coverage at 1 year was superior with Combo vs. EES [91.3% (95% CI 88.7%, 93.8%) vs. 74.8% (95% CI 70.0%, 79.6%), P < 0.001], with homogeneous tissue in 81.2% vs. 68.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Combo stent demonstrated non-inferior 1-year TVF and late loss in a randomized comparison to EES, with superior strut-based tissue coverage by OCT as a surrogate of EPC capture technology activity.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Drug-Eluting Stents , Endothelial Progenitor Cells/cytology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Antibodies/therapeutic use , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Coronary Angiography , Endothelial Progenitor Cells/metabolism , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Female , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Recurrence , Single-Blind Method , Tomography, Optical Coherence , United States
11.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(23): 2349-2359, 2017 12 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216997

ABSTRACT

Significant progress has been made in the percutaneous coronary intervention technique from the days of balloon angioplasty to modern-day metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). Although metallic stents solve a temporary problem of acute recoil following balloon angioplasty, they leave behind a permanent problem implicated in very late events (in addition to neoatherosclerosis). BRS were developed as a potential solution to this permanent problem, but the promise of these devices has been tempered by clinical trials showing increased risk of safety outcomes, both early and late. This is not too dissimilar to the challenges seen with first-generation DES in which refinement of deployment technique, prolongation of dual antiplatelet therapy, and technical iteration mitigated excess risk of very late stent thrombosis, making DES the treatment of choice for coronary artery disease. This white paper discusses the factors potentially implicated in the excess risks, including the scaffold consideration and deployment technique, and outlines patient and lesion selection, implantation technique, and dual antiplatelet therapy considerations to potentially mitigate this excess risk with the first-generation thick strut Absorb scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois). It remains to be seen whether these considerations together with technical iterations will ultimately close the gap between scaffolds and metal stents for short-term events while at the same time preserving options for future revascularization once the scaffold bioresorbs.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Prosthesis Design , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Diffusion of Innovation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Selection , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 86(6): 994-1001, 2015 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25678402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The TAXUS Element (ION) platinum chromium paclitaxel-eluting stent (PtCr-PES) incorporates a thin (81 µm) strut design with a similar polymer and drug dose density as prior PES. The pivotal PERSEUS trial program consisted of two studies: PERSEUS Workhorse (WH) and PERSEUS Small Vessel (SV). The PERSEUS WH trial demonstrated the PtCr-PES to be non-inferior to the predicate TAXUS Express PES (TE-PES) for target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year and in-segment angiographic percent diameter stenosis at 9 months. The PERSEUS SV trial demonstrated the PtCr-PES to be superior to a historical bare metal stent (BMS) for angiographic late lumen loss at 9 months. Long-term (5-year) clinical outcomes following PtCr-PES have not been previously reported. METHODS: PERSEUS WH was a prospective, Bayesian, 3:1 randomized (PtCr-PES vs. TE-PES) trial in patients with lesion length ≤28 mm and vessel diameter ≥2.75 to ≤4.0 mm. PERSEUS SV was a prospective, single-arm trial in patients with lesion length ≤20 mm and vessel diameter ≥2.25 to <2.75 mm comparing PtCr-PES to a matched historical BMS control. RESULTS: Among randomized subjects in the PERSEUS WH study, clinical event rates at 5 years were similar between treatment groups, including TLF (12.9% TE-PES vs. 12.1% PtCr-PES; P = 0.66). In the PERSEUS SV study, 5-year rates of MACE, and TLF were significantly lower for PtCr-PES (vs. BMS) following adjustment for baseline characteristics and were primarily due to lower target lesion revascularization rates (27.2% BMS vs. 14.9% PtCr-PES; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: At 5 years, the PtCr-PES provides efficacy and safety that is comparable to the TE-PES and superior efficacy with similar safety when compared with BMS in smaller caliber vessels. Cumulative stent thrombosis rates remained low and similar through 5 years for both DES platforms.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Coronary Disease/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Prosthesis Design/methods , Adult , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Bayes Theorem , Chromium/chemistry , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Platinum/chemistry , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Taxus , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
13.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 7(5): 510-8, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24852804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The ORBIT II (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OAS in Treating Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions) trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the coronary Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) to prepare de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions for stent placement. BACKGROUND: Despite advances in interventional techniques, treatment of calcified coronary lesions remains a challenge. Stent placement in these lesions may result in stent underexpansion, malapposition, and procedural complications. METHODS: ORBIT II is a prospective, multicenter, nonblinded clinical trial that enrolled 443 consecutive patients with severely calcified coronary lesions at 49 U.S. sites from May 25, 2010, to November 26, 2012. Investigators used the centrifugal action of the OAS diamond-coated crown to modify calcified lesions prior to stent placement. RESULTS: The pre-procedure mean minimal lumen diameter of 0.5 mm increased to 2.9 mm after the procedure. The primary safety endpoint was 89.6% freedom from 30-day major adverse cardiac events compared with the performance goal of 83%. The primary efficacy endpoint (residual stenosis <50% post-stent without in-hospital major adverse cardiac events) was 88.9% compared with the performance goal of 82%. Stent delivery occurred successfully in 97.7% of cases with <50% stenosis in 98.6% of subjects. Low rates of in-hospital Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.7%), cardiac death (0.2%), and target vessel revascularization (0.7%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The ORBIT II coronary OAS trial met both the primary safety and efficacy endpoints by significant margins. Preparation of severely calcified plaque with the OAS not only helped facilitate stent delivery, but improved both acute and 30-day clinical outcomes compared with the outcomes of historic control subjects in this difficult-to-treat patient population. (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OAS in Treating Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions [ORBIT II]; NCT01092416).


Subject(s)
Atherectomy, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Vascular Calcification/therapy , Aged , Atherectomy, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vascular Calcification/diagnosis , Vascular Calcification/mortality
14.
Circ J ; 75(5): 1120-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21467655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term impact of treating de novo coronary lesions in native vessels and challenging small vessel and long lesion subsets with TAXUS Liberté stents is unknown. This report examines the 3-year efficacy and safety from the TAXUS ATLAS program. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS ATLAS WH, Small Vessel, and Long Lesion are non-randomized studies comparing TAXUS Liberté (n = 871), TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm (n = 261), and TAXUS Liberté 38 mm (n = 150) stents, respectively, to case-matched TAXUS Express historical controls. TAXUS Liberté demonstrated comparable 3-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (19.0% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.51) in de novo lesions, reduced target lesion revascularization (TLR, 10.0% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.008) in small vessels, and reduced myocardial infarction (MI, 2.9% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.01) and stent thrombosis (ST, 0.0% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.03) in long lesions vs. TAXUS Express. After propensity score adjustment, no statistically significant effect of TAXUS Liberté on TLR (9.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.12) in small vessels or MI (2.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.05) in long lesions was noted, although reduced ST (0.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.02) remained in long lesions. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that TAXUS Liberté treatment significantly reduced TLR by 66% in small vessels, and MI by 75% in long lesions, vs. TAXUS Express. CONCLUSIONS: TAXUS Liberté suggests durable 3-year effectiveness in reducing restenosis and improved clinical outcomes in small vessels and long lesions compared with TAXUS Express.


Subject(s)
Stents , Humans , Taxus
15.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 56(4): 264-71, 2010 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20493653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel platinum chromium TAXUS Element paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) compared with the TAXUS Express PES (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in treating coronary artery stenoses. BACKGROUND: The TAXUS Element is a novel thin-strut (81 microm), platinum chromium alloy PES designed to improve radial strength, radiopacity, and deliverability, while safely providing comparable restenosis benefit compared with a previous-generation PES. METHODS: The PERSEUS (Prospective Evaluation in a Randomized Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of the TAXUS Element Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System) Workhorse (WH) trial is a prospective, randomized (3:1), controlled, multicenter study of the TAXUS Element (vs. TAXUS Express) PES for the treatment of de novo coronary atherosclerotic lesionsor=2.75 to

Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys/administration & dosage , Coronary Angiography/standards , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/drug therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents/standards , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Aged , Chromium/administration & dosage , Chromium/adverse effects , Chromium Alloys/adverse effects , Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Platinum/administration & dosage , Platinum/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Miss State Med Assoc ; 48(5): 133-6, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17941250

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: North Mississippi Medical Center's (NMMC) Continuing Medical Education (CME) Program in collaboration with the NMMC Outcomes Managers / quality staff have been able successfully to bridge the gap between identifying topic needs and intended results. PROJECT: Planning began almost six years ago to join CME Activities with patient outcomes opportunities. Under the leadership of the CME Committee Chairman, the CME Program was charged with tying identified needs to results. NMMC's Outcomes Leader worked closely with the CME Coordinator to develop a process of topic selection that would ensure a focus on improving patient outcomes. RESULTS: The NMMC CME Program recently received exemplary status on tying identified topic needs to intended results during their re-accreditation survey. The best result, however, is the data reflecting improvements in patient outcomes when CME has been a part of the process of improvement. CONCLUSION: Linkage of CME to patient outcomes demonstrates a priority of provider education and transparent measurement provides accountability for the Medical Staff as well as the CME Program.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Humans , Mississippi
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 94(5): 595-601, 2004 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15342289

ABSTRACT

The Follow-Up Serial Infusions of Nesiritide pilot study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of outpatient serial infusions of nesiritide in 210 patients with decompensated heart failure who were randomly assigned to usual care only or usual care plus weekly infusions of nesiritide at dosages of 0.005 or 0.01 microg/kg/min for 12 weeks. The mean age +/- SD of the entire population was 67 +/- 13 years; 70% were men, and 80% were white. Mean baseline serum creatinine levels were 1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dl, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.28 +/- 0.15%. Diabetes mellitus was present in 106 patients (50%), and atrial arrhythmias were present in 100 patients (48%). A totalof 1,645 nesiritide infusions was administered; 11 (< 1%) were discontinued due to an adverse event. All treatment groups had a similar frequency of adverse events and experienced improvements in quality of life. Administration of nesiritide resulted in acute decreases in aldosterone and endothelin-1 concentrations. Although there were no statistically significant differences among groups by outcome, prospectively defined higher risk subgroups demonstrated significant decreases in cardiovascular events. These results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of administering nesiritide in an outpatient setting. Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of outpatient serial infusions of nesiritide on rates of morbidity and mortality in advanced heart failure.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/drug therapy , Natriuretic Agents/administration & dosage , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/administration & dosage , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Drug Saf ; 27 Suppl 1: 11-8, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15293849

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the precautions and adverse effects associated with vesnarinone use, and the potential mechanisms responsible for these complications as well as suggested treatment strategies. Vesnarinone, a quinolinone derivative, improves the haemodynamics and quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF); however, it is associated with the adverse effects of increased sudden cardiac death and neutropenia. These adverse effects have limited the application of vesnarinone to the general population but perhaps with continued research into vesnarinone-induced neutropenia and advances in arrhythmia management, the risk/ benefit ratio of vesnarinone may become favourable. For now, the use of vesnarinone should be limited to patients with CHF who have demonstrated a poor response to other cardiac medications and devices. These patients should be closely monitored for both cardiac and non-cardiac adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Death, Sudden/prevention & control , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/prevention & control , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/complications , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Pyrazines , Quinolines/antagonists & inhibitors , Quinolones/adverse effects , Quinolones/antagonists & inhibitors , Quinolones/therapeutic use
19.
Clin Cardiol ; 27(6): 343-6, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15237694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The mechanism of AF after CABG is not well defined; however, it is suggested that endogenous adenosine, released in response to tissue hypoxia, may play a mechanistic role in these arrhythmias. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to examine whether intravenous theophylline, via adenosine A1 receptor antagonism, would correct or modify new-onset early (<48 h post CABG) atrial fibrillation in patients post CABG, and thereby implicate endogenous adenosine as an inciting agent. METHODS: A prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled study design was applied to 385 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who had undergone CABG. Any patient who developed AF within 48 h of the operative procedure was randomly assigned to receive 5 mg/kg of intravenous theophylline (Group A) or matched intravenous placebo (Group B). The patients who converted to sinus rhythm within 15 min of drug administration were accepted as showing positive responses. RESULTS: Thirty patients comprised the study group. In Group A, 8 of the 15 patients (53%) converted from AF to sinus rhythm within 15 min of theophylline administration. One patient who converted to sinus rhythm 20 min after theophylline administration was accepted as showing a negative response. In the placebo-treated group, no patient converted to sinus rhythm within 15 min (p<0.007 compared with Group A). CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of AF after CABG is not well defined and is probably multifactorial. However, this study demonstrated that antagonism of the adenosine A1 receptor can promptly convert many of these patients back to sinus rhythm, and thereby implicates endogenously released adenosine in a mechanistic role for inciting early (<48 h) post-CABG AF.


Subject(s)
Adenosine/antagonists & inhibitors , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Theophylline/administration & dosage , Adenosine/adverse effects , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Prospective Studies , Theophylline/pharmacokinetics
20.
J Behav Med ; 26(6): 535-51, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14677211

ABSTRACT

This study examined the contribution of biomedical and psychological variables in the report of anginal frequency at 6-week, 6- and 12-month follow-up in patients who received angioplasty with and without stent. Patients (N = 70) completed a battery of standardized questionnaries, including measures of depression, anxiety, and anger. Principal components analysis computed a single factor of negative emotion for use as a predictor in regression analyses. For the 6-week model, only baseline anginal frequency predicted anginal frequency. Negative emotion joined baseline anginal frequency in the prediction model for 6-month anginal frequency, and collectively accounted for 23% of the variance. For the 12-month model, baseline anginal frequency, female sex, and negative emotions remained in the model, accounting for 46% of the variance in anginal frequency. These results highlight the importance of biomedical and psychosocial variables in predicting anginal frequency with psychological variables sustaining predictive value over the course of recovery.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/psychology , Angina, Unstable/psychology , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/psychology , Myocardial Infarction/psychology , Stents/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angina Pectoris/diagnosis , Angina Pectoris/therapy , Angina, Unstable/diagnosis , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/complications , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Principal Component Analysis , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...